Entirely forgettable, one of Disney's worst live-action offerings up until 1995 from the ones I've seen to date, which is the majority, it's in my bottom six in fact. I don't want a '3 day training' to start on a a Friday and end on a Tuesday, as that would result in excessive per diem & lodging costs, so my objective is for Project (2010) to be forced to fit multi-day training events into a week without splitting over a weekend. It's nothing amazing, but I could appreciate what they were trying to do with that at the very least. I am trying to put together a training schedule that will involve a great deal of travel to a small number of employees. There's one, very minor, part I did like and that was King Arthur's little story with the Excalibur sword. As noted earlier, they try to make it noteworthy by colliding the two differing eras but it just comes across as lazy. Disney already adapted the Mark Twain novel in 1979 with 'Unidentified Flying Oddball', which I didn't love, so it's bizarre they chose to go back to it. The premise is just so dumb and uninteresting. This simply doesn't do that, though there is an interesting caveat - as both Kate Winslet and Daniel Craig incredibly appear, in just their third and second films respectively - huge credit to the Hubbards & Co., the UK casting directors. The casting can make such a difference in how your film comes out, you can have a load of crap but if you get a strong cast you can still produce something good. old days' theme way too much, it needed more to it. The writing is substandard, while the dialogue is actually terrible it forces the 'present day vs.
Everything about 'A Kid in King Arthur's Court' is just so poor, the whole feel of the film is extremely low-budget and limp.
0 kommentar(er)
